4.2 Article

Different multivariate techniques for automated classification of MRI data in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 212, Issue 2, Pages 89-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.11.005

Keywords

Multivariate analysis; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); AddNeuroMed; Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment

Funding

  1. InnoMed, (Innovative Medicines in Europe)
  2. European Union of the Sixth Framework program, Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health [FP6-2004-LIFESCIHEALTH-5]
  3. University of Eastern Finland for UEFBRAIN consortium
  4. Stockholm Medical Image Laboratory and Education (SMILE)
  5. Alzheimer Research UK
  6. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London
  7. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  8. Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
  9. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-EXT2013-4, ART-PG2010-4] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10053] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automated structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) processing pipelines and different multivariate techniques are gaining popularity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. We used four supervised learning methods to classify AD patients and controls (CTL) and to prospectively predict the conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD from baseline MRI data. A total of 345 participants from the AddNeuroMed cohort were included in this study; 116 AD patients, 119 MCI patients and 110 CTL individuals. High resolution sagittal 3D MP-RAGE datasets were acquired and MRI data were processed using FreeSurfer. We explored the classification ability of orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS), decision trees (Trees), artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM). Applying 10-fold cross-validation demonstrated that SVM and OPLS were slightly superior to Trees and ANN, although not statistically significant for distinguishing between AD and CTL. The classification experiments resulted in up to 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity for the best techniques. For the prediction of conversion of MCI patients at baseline to AD at 1-year follow-up, we obtained an accuracy of up to 86%. The value of the multivariate models derived from the classification of AD vs. CTL was shown to be robust and efficient in the identification of MCI converters. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available