4.2 Article

White matter metabolism differentiates schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a preliminary PET study

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 214, Issue 3, Pages 410-414

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.08.011

Keywords

Brain activity; Prefrontal cortex; Limbic structures; Cerebellum; Connectivity

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GIOVANE RICERCATORE GR-2010-2316745]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluorodeoxyglucose-F18 positron emission tomography studies (FOG-PET) have shown similar corticolimbic metabolic dysregulation in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, with hypoactive prefrontal cortex coupled with hyperactive anterior limbic areas. However, it is not clear whether white matter metabolism connecting these regions is differently affected in the two disorders. Twenty-six patients with schizophrenia (mean age +/- 5.0.=30.23 +/- 9.7 year-old; 19 males; mean weight +/- S.D.=71 +/- 3 kg) and 26 patients with bipolar disorder (mean +/- age S.D.=48.73 +/- 13 year-old; 18 males; mean weight +/- S. D.=75 +/- 15 kg) underwent an FOG-PET scan. Normalized datasets the two groups of patients were compared on a voxel-by-voxel basis using a two-sample t. statistic Lest as implemented in SPM8, and adding age as covariate. Group differences were assessed applying a threshold of p < 0.0005. White matter metabolic rates significantly differed between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, whereas no differences were shown for cortical activity. This is the first FOG-PET, to our best knowledge, directly comparing subjects with schizophrenia to those with bipolar disorder, It reports decreased activity in the center of large fronto-temporal and cerebellar white matter tracts in patients with schizophrenia in respect to those with bipolar disorder. This feature may characterize and differentiate the regional brain metabolism of the two illnesses. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available