4.2 Article

Abnormal cerebellar morphometry in abstinent adolescent marijuana users

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 182, Issue 2, Pages 152-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.12.004

Keywords

Adolescents; MRI; Cerebellum; Vermis; Cannabis; Marijuana

Funding

  1. [R01 AA13419]
  2. [R01 DA021182]
  3. [F32 DA020206]
  4. [R03 DA027457]
  5. [K08 NS52147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional neuroimaging data from adults have, in general, revealed frontocerebellar dysfunction associated with acute. and chronic marijuana (MJ) use The goal of this study was to characterize cerebellar volume in adolescent chronic MJ users following 1 month of monitored abstinence. Participants were MJ users (n = 16) and controls (n = 16) aged 16-18 years Extensive exclusionary criteria included history of psychiatric or neurologic disorders Drug use history, neuropsychological data, and structural brain scans were collected after 28 days of monitored abstinence Trained research staff defined cerebellar volumes (including three cerebellar vermis lobes and both cerebellar hemispheres) on high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance images Adolescent MJ users demonstrated significantly larger inferior posterior (lobules VIII-X) vermis volume than controls, above and beyond effects of lifetime alcohol and other drug use, gender, and intracranial volume Larger vermis volumes were associated with poorer executive functioning. Following 1 month of abstinence, adolescent MJ users had significantly larger posterior cerebellar vermis volumes than non-using controls These greater volumes are suggested to be pathological based on linkage to poorer executive functioning. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine typical cerebellar development during adolescence and the influence of marijuana use (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available