4.2 Article

Color Stroop and negative priming in schizophrenia: An fMRI study

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 24-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.07.005

Keywords

fMRI; Color Stroop; Negative priming; Schizophrenia

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R03 MH 068464-01, R03 MH 078036, K05MH070047, R01 MH 40799, P50 MH 080272]
  2. National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NAMIC)
  3. National Institutes of Health [U54 EB005149]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disturbances in selective attention represent a core characteristic of schizophrenia, whose neural underpinnings have yet to be fully elucidated. Consequently, we recorded brain activation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while 15 patients with schizophrenia and 15 age-matched controls performed a well-established measure of selective attention-the color Stroop negative priming task. We focused on two aspects of performance: overriding pre-potent responses (Stroop effect) and inhibition of prior negatively primed trials (negative priming effect). Behaviorally, controls demonstrated both significant Stroop and negative priming effects, while schizophrenic subjects only showed the Stroop effect. For the Stroop effect, fMRI indicated significantly greater activation in frontal regions-medial frontal gyrus/anterior cingulate gyrus and middle frontal gyrus for controls-but greater activation in medial parietal regions (posterior cingulate gyrus/precuneus) for patients. Negative priming elicited significant activation in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for both groups, but also in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for patients. These different patterns of fMRI activation may reflect faulty interaction in schizophrenia within networks of brain regions that are vital to selective attention. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available