4.2 Article

Reduced brain activation in euthymic bipolar patients during response inhibition: An event-related fMRI study

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 173, Issue 1, Pages 45-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.08.003

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Euthymia; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Go-NoGo task; Response inhibition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deficits in inhibitory control have been reported in euthymic bipolar disorder patients. To date, data on the neuroanatomical correlates of these deficits are exclusively related to cognitive inhibition. This study aimed to examine the neural substrates of motor inhibitory control in euthymic bipolar patients. Groups of 20 patients with euthymic bipolar disorder and 20 demographically matched healthy subjects underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a Go-NoGo task. Between-group differences in brain activation associated with motor response inhibition were assessed by using random-effects analyses. Although euthymic bipolar patients and healthy subjects performed similarly on the Go-NoGo task, they showed different patterns of brain activation associated with response inhibition. Specifically, patients exhibited significantly decreased activation in the left frontopolar cortex and bilateral dorsal amygdala compared with healthy subjects. There were no brain regions that were significantly more activated in patients than in healthy subjects. The findings suggest that euthymic bipolar patients have deficits in their ability to engage the left frontopolar cortex and bilateral dorsal amygdala during response inhibition. Further research should ascertain the role that such deficits may play in the emergence of impulsive behaviors that characterize bipolar disorder. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available