4.3 Article

Influence of mussel aquaculture on the distribution of vagile benthic macrofauna in iles de la Madeleine, eastern Canada

Journal

AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 175-183

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/aei00123

Keywords

Mytilus edulis; Homarus americanus; Cancer irroratus; Asterias rubens; Pseudopleuronectes americanus; Spatial variation; Environmental impact

Funding

  1. Aquaculture Collaborative Research and Development Program (ACRDP) through Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  2. Ressources Aquatiques Quebec (RAQ)
  3. Societe de Developpement de l'Industrie Maricole Inc. (SODIM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined spatial variation in the abundance of 4 benthic vagile species in a lagoon with blue mussel Mytilus edulis aquaculture (inside vs. outside of the mussel lease; among areas with 1 yr old, 2 yr old and harvested mussels; and with distance from mussel lines). American lobster Homarus americanus, Atlantic rock crab Cancer irroratus, common starfish Asterias rubens and winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus were all at least 3 times more abundant in the farm area with 2 yr old mussels, where mussel fall-off is more frequent, than in areas outside of the farm or other areas within the farm. A strong association of lobsters with mussel line structures was observed, where most individuals were observed directly under the mussel lines, close to anchor blocks, in the areas with 1 yr old, 2 yr old and harvested mussels (58, 42 and 57%, respectively). Mussel farms influence the distribution of benthic macrofauna at a number of spatial and temporal scales, and this may be due to a number of mechanisms, depending on the species. An in situ experiment was done to separate the influence of anchor blocks and mussel fall-off on the distribution of lobsters, crabs, starfish and flounders. Results of the manipulative experiment highlighted the importance of shelter structures over a short-term period for lobsters, but not for the other 3 species. Conclusions from the observations and the manipulative experiment suggest that lobster distribution is a function of both physical structure and feeding opportunities, whereas the distribution of the other species was mainly due to trophic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available