4.3 Article

Snow thickness retrieval from L-band brightness temperatures: a model comparison

Journal

ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 69, Pages 9-17

Publisher

INT GLACIOL SOC
DOI: 10.3189/2015AoG69A886

Keywords

remote sensing; sea ice; snow

Funding

  1. Cluster of Excellence 'CliSAP', University of Hamburg through the German Science Foundation (DFG) [EXC177]
  2. International Space Science Institute, Bern, Switzerland [245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite's L-band (1.4 GHz) measurements have been used to retrieve snow thickness over thick sea ice in a previous study. Here we consider brightness temperature simulations for 2.5-4.5 m thick Arctic multi-year ice and compare the results of the relatively simple emission model (M2013) used previously for the retrieval with simulations from a more complex model (T2011) that combines a sea-ice version of the Microwave Emission Model for Layered Snowpacks (MEMLS) with a thermodynamic model. We find that L-band brightness temperature is mainly determined by ice temperature. In the M2013 model, ice temperature in turn is mainly determined by surface temperature and snow thickness, and this dependence has been used previously to explain the potential for a snow thickness retrieval. Our comparisons suggest that the M2013 retrieval model may benefit from a more sophisticated thermodynamic calculation of the ice temperature or from using independent temperature data (e.g. from 6 GHz channels). In both models, horizontally polarized brightness temperatures increase with snow thickness while holding surface temperature, ice thickness and snow density near constant. The increase in the T2011 model is steeper than in M2013, suggesting a higher sensitivity to snow thickness than found earlier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available