4.7 Article

How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-year follow-up study of boys with ADHD

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 177, Issue 3, Pages 299-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.12.010

Keywords

Longitudinal; Adult; Remission; ADHD

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [5R01HD036317-10]
  2. Lilly Foundation
  3. Pediatric Psychopharmacology Philanthropic Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main aim of this study was to examine the age-dependent persistence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in boys transitioning from adolescence into early adulthood attending to different definitions of persistence. We conducted a 10-year follow-up study (mean follow-up time = 11 years) of 110 boys with ADHD and 105 non-ADHD controls. Both groups were 6-17 years of age at ascertainment. ADHD was considered persistent at follow-up if subjects met full or subthreshold (more than half of the symptoms required for a full diagnosis) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria, failed to attain functional remission (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF score <= 60) or were receiving treatment for ADHD. While 65% of children with ADHD no longer met full DSM-IV criteria for ADHD at the 10-year follow-up, 78% of subjects met at least one of our definitions of persistence. Persistence as described above was associated with more psychiatric co-morbidity, more familiality with mood disorders and higher levels of educational and interpersonal impairments than controls. This 10-year longitudinal follow-up study shows that the majority of ADHD boys experience persistent symptoms and functional impairments into early adulthood. Persistence of ADHD is associated with greater psychiatric comorbidity, familiality and functional impairments. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available