4.7 Article

Reduced folic acid, vitamin B-12 and docosahexaenoic acid and increased homocysteine and cortisol in never-medicated schizophrenia patients: Implications for altered one-carbon metabolism

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 175, Issue 1-2, Pages 47-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.013

Keywords

Docosahexaenoic acid; Folic acid; Homocysteine; Vitamin B-12; Cortisol; Schizophrenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abnormal one-carbon metabolism has long been suggested as one of the mechanisms for neuropathology and psychopathology of schizophrenia. Variable levels of components of one-carbon metabolism (folic acid and vitamin B-12) and consequent altered levels of homocysteine and phospholipid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been independently reported, mostly in medicated patients. This study examined the simultaneous levels of these key components of one-carbon metabolism and its consequences in unique, medication-naive first-episode psychotic patients (FEP, n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 48) matched for confounds such as race. diet and lifestyle to reduce the variability. Significantly lower levels of folate and vitamin B-12 in plasma and folate in red blood cells were observed in FEP compared to HC. These reductions paralleled the significant increase in plasma homocysteine and cortisol levels. Significantly reduced levels of membrane DHA were also observed in FEP compared to HC. This study, using a unique cohort, provided a broader mechanism (disturbed folic acid-vitamin B-12-DHA balance) of altered one-carbon metabolism and one of its key consequential components, an increased homocysteine level that together with cortisol, can contribute to the neuropathology of psychosis. These data may have important implications for the amelioration of psychopathology in schizophrenia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available