4.3 Article

Employment Status of People With Mental Illness: National Survey Data From 2009 and 2010

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
Volume 65, Issue 10, Pages 1201-1209

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300335

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA030391]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [HS22191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe employment according to mental illness severity in the United States during 2009 and 2010. Methods: The sample included all working-age participants (ages 18-64) from the 2009 and 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N=77,326). Two well-established scales of mental health distinguished participants with none, mild, moderate, and serious mental illness. Analyses compared employment rate and income by mental illness severity. Employment status was estimated with logistic regression models that controlled for demographic characteristics and substance use disorders. In secondary analyses the relationship between mental illness and employment was assessed for variation by age and education status. Results: Employment rates decreased with increasing mental illness severity (no mental illness, 75.9% employment; mild, 68.8%; moderate, 62.7%; and serious, 54.5%, p<.001). Over a third of people with serious mental illness, 38.5%, had incomes <$10,000 (compared with 23.1% of people with no mental illness, p<.001). The gap in adjusted employment rates comparing persons with serious versus no mental illness was 1% among people 18-25 years old versus 21% among people 50-64 (p<.001). Conclusions: More severe mental illness was associated with lower employment rates in 2009 and 2010. People with serious mental illness are less likely than people with no, mild, or moderate mental illness to be employed after age 49.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available