4.3 Article

Primary Care Providers' Views on Metabolic Monitoring of Outpatients Taking Antipsychotic Medication

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 597-599

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.002542012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Aging in Diverse Communities under the Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research program by the National Institute on Aging [P30-AG15272]
  2. National Center for Research Resources, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of the Director through UCSF-CTSI [KL2 RR024130]
  4. National Institutes of Mental Health [1K23MH093689]
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P30DK092924]
  6. ATT Foundation
  7. Pfizer
  8. McKesson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate attitudes of primary care providers toward barriers to metabolic monitoring and to characterize their beliefs about providers' responsibility for monitoring and reducing cardiovascular risk for people with severe mental illness. Methods: An anonymous survey was administered to 214 primary care providers working in 23 public community health clinics in San Francisco. Results: The response rate was 77% (164 of 214). Nearly 40% of primary care providers were unaware of consensus guidelines for metabolic monitoring of people who take second-generation antipsychotic medications. Responses showed variation in providers' beliefs about who should monitor patients' metabolic risk. The major barriers to metabolic monitoring were severity of psychiatric illness, difficulty collaborating with psychiatrists, and difficulty arranging psychiatric follow-up. Conclusions: Primary care providers believed that better communication between primary care providers and psychiatrists would facilitate metabolic monitoring and promote better treatment for patients with severe mental illness who are taking antipsychotic medications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available