4.3 Article

Effectiveness of telephone-based referral care management, a brief intervention to improve psychiatric treatment engagement

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
Volume 59, Issue 7, Pages 776-781

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.7.776

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [5 T32 MH 19931] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of a telephone-based referral care management (TBR-CM) intervention for improving engagement in psychiatric treatment. Methods: From September 2005 to May 2006, 169 primary care patients at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center completed a psychiatric diagnostic interview and were identified as needing psychiatric care. From this total of eligible patients, 113 ( 67%) gave informed consent and were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or the intervention. Usual care consisted of participants' being schedule for a behavioral health care appointment, followed by a letter and reminder by telephone. The intervention group received the same, plus one or two brief motivational telephone sessions. Participant interviews and medical records provided study data. Results: Research participants were primarily African American and 22-83 years old. In the sample, 40 patients (39%) had severe depression, 40 ( 39%) had substance use problems, and 33 ( 22%) had co-occurring severe depression and substance abuse. Overall, 40 participants (70%) in the intervention group compared with 18 ( 32%) in the usual care group engaged in at least one psychiatric treatment appointment ( p <. 001). Analyses also indicated that on average the intervention group attended more appointments ( more than three) compared with the usual care group ( less than two) ( p=. 008). Conclusions: The TBR-CM intervention program was effective at improving psychiatric treatment engagement. Future research is necessary to examine effectiveness of TBR-CM in more heterogeneous and larger samples and to evaluate economic benefits versus costs of intervention delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available