4.0 Article

Characterizing the Feeding Habits of the Testate Amoebae Hyalosphenia papilio and Nebela tincta along a Narrow Fen-Bog Gradient Using Digestive Vacuole Content and 13C and 15N Isotopic Analyses

Journal

PROTIST
Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages 451-464

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.07.006

Keywords

Ecological gradient; food preference; C-13 and N-15 isotopes; peatland; Sphagnum; testate amoebae

Categories

Funding

  1. French National Agency for Research [ANR-07-VUL-010]
  2. Franche-Comte Region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Population dynamics and feeding habits of the testate amoebae Nebela tincta and Hyalosphenia papilio were studied along a short fen to bog gradient in a Sphagnum-dominated mire (Jura, France). Samples were collected in living top segments (0-3 cm) and early declining bottom segments (36 cm) of Sphagnum fallax peat. Observations of digestive vacuole content and stable isotope analyses (C-13 and N-15) were used to establish the feeding behavior of both testate amoeba species. Owing to their vertical distribution, the feeding habit of H. papilio was described from top segments, and that of N. tincta from bottom segments. Among identified food sources, those most frequently ingested by N. tincta were spores and mycelia of fungi (55%), microalgae (25%) and cyanobacteria (8.5%). For H. papilio, the most frequently ingested prey were ciliates (55%) and microalgae (35%). Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling analysis clearly demonstrated that the two species did not have the same feeding habit along the fen-bog gradient, and furthermore that a significant spatial split exists in the feeding behavior of H. papilio. Additionally, isotope analyses suggested that H. papilio and N. tincta did not have the same trophic position in the microbial food web, probably resulting from their different feeding strategies. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available