4.1 Article

Aminopeptidase activities as prospective urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer

Journal

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue 5-6, Pages 317-326

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201300118

Keywords

Activity biomarkers; Aminopeptidases; Bladder cancer; Fluorescence; Urine

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [U24 CA126485]
  2. Weiner Fund
  3. NIH-NRSA [T32 CA82088]
  4. American Urological Association Foundation Research Scholar Award
  5. Society of Women in Urology Elisabeth Pickett Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Proteases have been implicated in cancer progression and invasiveness. We have investigated the activities, as opposed to simple protein levels, of selected aminopeptidases in urine specimens to serve as potential novel biomarkers for urothelial cancer. Experimental design: The unique urinary proteomes of males and females were profiled to establish the presence of a gender-independent set of aminopeptidases. Samples were also collected from patients with urothelial cancer and matched controls. A SOP for urine processing was developed taking into account hydration variation. Five specific aminopeptidase activity assays, using fluorophoric substrates, were optimized for evaluation of marker potential. Results: Nineteen exopeptidases and 21 other proteases were identified in urine and the top-five most abundant aminopeptidases, identical in both genders, selected for functional studies. Depending on the enzyme, activities were consistently lower (p <= 0.05), higher or unchanged in the cancer samples as compared to controls. Two selected aminopeptidase activities used as a binary classifier resulted in a ROC curve with an AUC = 0.898. Conclusion and clinical relevance: We have developed functional assays that characterize aminopeptidase activities in urine specimens with adequate technical and intraindividual reproducibility. With further testing, it could yield a reliable biomarker test for bladder cancer detection or prognostication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available