4.1 Article

Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid aminoterminally truncated and oxidized amyloid-β peptides

Journal

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue 3-4, Pages 163-169

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201100082

Keywords

Alzheimer's dementia; Aminoterminally truncated; Cerebrospinal fluid; Electrophoresis; Oxidized amyloid-ss peptides

Funding

  1. State Government North Rhine-Westphalia: PURE (Protein Research Unit Ruhr within Europe)
  2. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Carboxyterminally elongated and aminoterminally truncated A beta peptides as well as their pyroglutamate and oxidized derivates are major constituents of human amyloid plaques. The objective of the present study was to characterize aminoterminally truncated or oxidized A beta 38, A beta 40, and A beta 42 peptide species in immunoprecipitated human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Experimental design We invented a novel sequential aminoterminally and carboxyterminally specific immunoprecipitation protocol and used the A beta-SDS-PAGE/immunoblot for subsequent analysis of CSF A beta peptide patterns. Results In the present study, we identified the aminoterminally truncated A beta peptides 240 and 242 as well as oxidized forms of A beta 138 and A beta 142 in CSF. Our protocol allowed the quantification of a pattern of A beta peptides 138ox, 240, and 242 in addition to the well known panel of A beta 137, 138, 139, 140, 140ox, and 142 in a group of seven patients with peripheral polyneuropathy. Conclusions and clinical relevance In the present approach, we could broaden the range of quantifiable A beta peptides described in previous studies (i.e., 137, 138, 139, 140, 140ox, and 142) by A beta 138ox, 240, and 242. An exact analysis of CSF A beta peptides regarding their carboxy- and aminoterminus as well as posttranslational modification seems promising with respect to diagnostic and pathogenic aspects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available