4.1 Article

Deep depletion of abundant serum proteins reveals low-abundant proteins as potential biomarkers for human ovarian cancer

Journal

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages 853-861

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.200800141

Keywords

Angiopoietin-like protein 3; Matrix metalloproteinase-9; MS; Ovarian cancer; Serum depletion

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2006AA02Z4A2, 2006AA02A303, 2007DFC30360, 2008DFA11320, 2006DFA2950]
  2. National Center for Integrative Biomedical Informatics from NIH, USA [U54DA021519]
  3. NIH, USA [R21CA106949-01A1]
  4. Ovarian Cancer Working Group Grant from the Cancer Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) ranks fifth as a cause of cancer deaths in women. Current diagnostic and monitoring markers have limited reliability for the detection of disease. We have tested the possibility of identifying candidate biomarkers present at low nanogram to picogram levels after removing both the 12 most abundant and 77 moderately abundant proteins from serum samples of EOC patients using antibody affinity columns. We showed that this approach allows the identification, of proteins that are expressed at nanogram per liter levels in the serum. Using ICAT/MS/MS analysis, we identified 51 proteins that are differentially expressed by at least twofold. These proteins include leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 6, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3, isoform 1 of epidermal growth factor receptor, angiopoictin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and phosphatidylcholine-sterol acyltransferase. We confirmed the differential expression of MMP9 and ANGPTL3 in normal and ovarian cancer sera by ELISA assays. Further robust clinical evaluation of the candidate markers identified is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available