4.5 Article

D-score: A search engine independent MD-score

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 1036-1041

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200408

Keywords

Bioinformatics; Peptide identification; PTM; PTM localization scores

Funding

  1. Ministerium fur Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (SARA, DYNAMO)
  3. Ghent University (Multidisciplinary Research Partnership Bioinformatics: from nucleotides to networks)
  4. PRIME-XS project
  5. European Union [262067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While peptides carrying PTMs are routinely identified in gel-free MS, the localization of the PTMs onto the peptide sequences remains challenging. Search engine scores of secondary peptide matches have been used in different approaches in order to infer the quality of site inference, by penalizing the localization whenever the search engine similarly scored two candidate peptides with different site assignments. In the present work, we show how the estimation of posterior error probabilities for peptide candidates allows the estimation of a PTM score called the D-score, for multiple search engine studies. We demonstrate the applicability of this score to three popular search engines: Mascot, OMSSA, and X!Tandem, and evaluate its performance using an already published high resolution data set of synthetic phosphopeptides. For those peptides with phosphorylation site inference uncertainty, the number of spectrum matches with correctly localized phosphorylation increased by up to 25.7% when compared to using Mascot alone, although the actual increase depended on the fragmentation method used. Since this method relies only on search engine scores, it can be readily applied to the scoring of the localization of virtually any modification at no additional experimental or in silico cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available