4.5 Article

Visualization and quantification of cerebral metabolic fluxes of glucose in awake mice

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 14, Issue 7-8, Pages 829-838

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300047

Keywords

Focused microwave irradiation; MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry; Metabolic flux; Stable isotope; Technology

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO), Suematsu Gas Biology Project, in Tokyo by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [24500448]
  2. JST-Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO) program
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24500448] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biotransformation of glucose in organs includes multiple pathways, while quantitative evaluation of percentages of its utilization for individual pathways and their spatial heterogeneity in vivo remain unknown. Imaging MS (IMS) and metabolomics combined with a focused microwave irradiation for rapidly fixing tissue metabolism allowed us to quantify and visualize metabolic fluxes of glucose-derived metabolites in the mouse brain in vivo. At 15 min after the intraperitoneal injection of C-13(6)-labeled glucose, the mouse brain was exposed to focused microwave irradiation, which can stop brain metabolism within 1 s. Quantification of metabolic intermediates containing C-13 atoms revealed that a majority of the C-13(6)-glucose was diverted into syntheses of glutamate, lactate, and uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose. IMS showed that regions rich in glutaminergic neurons exhibited a large signal of C-13(2)-labeled glutamate. On the other hand, the midbrain region was enriched with an intensive C-13(6)-labeled UDP-glucose signal, suggesting an active glycogen synthesis. Collectively, application of the current method makes it possible to examine the fluxes of glucose metabolism in a region-specific manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available