4.5 Review

Maize proteomics: An insight into the biology of an important cereal crop

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 3-4, Pages 637-662

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200275

Keywords

Development; Maize; Plant proteomics; Stress; Tissue; Zea mays

Funding

  1. Genomics for Southern Crop Stress and Disease
  2. USDA CSREES [2009-34609-20222, ED0007/01/01]
  3. Centre of the Region Hana for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research
  4. Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
  5. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [P501/11/1764]
  6. NIFA [2009-34609-20222, 581392] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. EPSCoR [903787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most grown cereal crop in the world (839 million tons in 2012). According to its agro-economical importance, maize has received tremendous attention from research communities of academic, state, and industry origin. In this manuscript, we aspire to provide readers with the first comprehensive review of proteomics studies performed on maize within a 19872012 time period. The following topics are presented here: maize proteome profiling, developmental proteomics, response to abiotic and biotic stress, maize phosphoproteomics, tissue-specific wild-type versus mutant analyses, heterosis, seed viability, maize allergens, and safety assessment of genetically modified maize. Tissues, organelles, subcellular compartments, secretomes, methods, phenomena, and pertinent proteins were summarized and referenced in tables and figures to provide readers with expediently accessible information in the context of up-to-date achievements. This review illustrates maize proteomics as a firmly established research area with laboratories around the world diligently advancing our knowledge of diverse aspects of maize biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available