4.5 Article

The good, the bad, the ugly: Validating the mass spectrometric analysis of modified peptides

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1099-1109

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000562

Keywords

Glycosylation; Label-free; Phosporylation; Quality control; Quantification; Technology

Funding

  1. Ministerium fur Innovation, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [31P5800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass spectrometric characterization of protein modifications is usually based on single peptides. With the advent of large-scale PTM-focussed MS studies, vast amounts of data are generated continuously, providing biologists extremely valuable and virtually never-ending sources for targeted functional research. However, even more than for proteomics in general, appropriate strategies for quality control of the different steps of the analytical strategy are imperative to prevent functional researchers from doing Sisyphos work on false-positive and unconfident PTM assignments. Here, we describe strategies to address the important issue of quality control for PTM analysis on various levels of the analytical pipeline: sample preparation/processing, analysis/identification and finally data interpretation, for qualitative as well as quantitative studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available