4.5 Article

Analysis of the serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphoproteome of the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes reveals phosphorylated proteins related to virulence

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages 4155-4165

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100259

Keywords

Listeria monocytogenes; MS; Microbiology; Phosphoproteome; Virulence

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-BLAN-0273-01]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0273] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorylation is the most common and widely studied post-translational protein modification in bacteria. It plays an important role in all kinds of cellular processes and controls key regulatory mechanisms, including virulence in certain pathogens. To gain insight into the role of protein phosphorylation in the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, the serine (Ser), threonine (Thr) and tyrosine (Tyr) phosphoproteome of this bacterium was determined. We used the gel free'' proteomic approach with high accuracy mass spectrometry after enrichment of phosphopeptides. A total of 143 sites of phosphorylation were clearly identified, on 155 unique peptides of 112 phosphoproteins. The Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylation site distribution was 93:43:7. All identified phosphopeptides are monophosphorylated, except one and many identified phosphoproteins are related to virulence, translation, phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system, glycolysis and stress response. A description of these phosphoproteins is provided together with a comparison of the phosphosites in the L. monocytogenes proteins and in their homologues of other bacteria for which the phosphoproteome has been determined. Compared with the previous studies, we noticed a more extended conservation of the phosphorylation sites in glycolytic enzymes as well as ribosomal proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available