4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of urinary biomarker candidates for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 135-144

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000810

Keywords

Biomedicine; Human Protein Atlas; Mass spectrometry; Urinary bladder cancer; Urine

Funding

  1. Kjell and Marta Beijer foundation
  2. Foundation in Memory of Johanna Hagstrand and Sigfrid Linners (Stiftelsen Johanna Hagstrand och Sigfrid Linners Minne)
  3. Lions Cancer Foundation (Uppsala)
  4. Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation (Stockholm, Sweden)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonmuscle invasive tumors of the bladder often recur and thereby bladder cancer patients need regular re-examinations which are invasive, unpleasant, and expensive. A noninvasive and less expensive method, e.g. a urine dipstick test, for monitoring recurrence would thus be advantageous. In this study, the complementary techniques mass spectrometry (MS) and Western blotting (WB)/dot blot (DB) were used to screen the urine samples from bladder cancer patients. High resolving MS was used to analyze and quantify the urinary proteome and 29 proteins had a significantly higher abundance (p < 0.05) in bladder cancer samples compared with control urine samples. The increased abundance found in urine from bladder cancer patients compared with controls was confirmed with Western blot for four selected proteins; fibrinogen beta chain precursor, apolipoprotein E, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1. Dot blot analysis of an independent urine sample set pointed out fibrinogen beta chain and alpha-1-antitrypsin as most interesting biomarkers having sensitivity and specificity values in the range of 66-85%. Exploring the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) also revealed that bladder cancer tumors are the likely source of these proteins. They have the potential of being useful in diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and thus may improve the treatment of bladder tumors, especially nonmuscle invasive tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available