4.8 Article

Functional Pillared Graphene Frameworks for Ultrahigh Volumetric Performance Supercapacitors

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500771

Keywords

pillared graphene; supercapacitors; volumetric performance

Funding

  1. Harbin Innovation Talents of Science and Technology Research Special Fund Project [2012RFXXG005]
  2. Fundamental Research funds for the Central Universities
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [E201416]
  4. Excellent Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [JC201210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supercapacitors, also known as electrochemical capacitors, can provide much faster charge-discharge, greater power density, and cyclability than batteries, but they are still limited by lower energy densities (or the amount of energy stored per unit volume). Here, a novel strategy for the synthesis of functional pillared graphene frameworks, in which graphene fragments in-between graphene sheets, through simple thermal-treatment of ozone (O-3)-treated graphene oxide at very low temperature of 200 degrees C is reported. Due to its high packing density, high content of stable oxygen species, and continues ion transport network in-between graphene sheets, the functional pillared-graphene framework delivers not only high gravimetric capacitance (353 F g(-1) based on the mass of the active material) and ultrahigh volumetric capacitance (400 F cm(-3) based on total mass of electrode material) in aqueous electrolyte but also excellent cyclic stability with 104% of its initial capacitance retention after 10 000 cycles. Moreover, the assembled symmetric supercapacitor achieves as high as 27 Wh L-1 of volumetric energy density at a power density of 272 W L-1. This novel strategy holds great promise for future design of high volumetric capacitance supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available