4.5 Article

Comparative analysis of the secretory proteome of human adipose stromal vascular fraction cells during adipogenesis

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 394-405

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900218

Keywords

Adipogenesis; Adipose stromal vascular fraction cells; Cell biology; Differentiation; LC/MS/MS; Secretome

Funding

  1. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)
  2. Korea Industrial Technology Foundation (KOTEF)
  3. Korean Ministry of Education and Science [FPR08B1-160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adipogenesis is a complex process that is accompanied by a number of molecular events. In this study, a proteomic approach was adopted to identify secretory factors associated with adipogenesis. A label-free shotgun proteomic strategy was implemented to analyze proteins secreted by human adipose stromal vascular fraction cells and differentiated adipocytes. A total of 474 proteins were finally identified and classified according to quantitative changes and statistical significances. Briefly, 177 proteins were significantly upregulated during adipogenesis (Class 1), whereas 60 proteins were significantly downregulated (Class II). Changes in the expressions of several proteins were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting. One obvious finding based on proteomic data was that the amounts of several extracellular modulators of Wnt and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling changed during adipogenesis. The expressions of secreted frizzled-related proteins, dickkopf-related proteins, and latent TGF-beta-binding proteins were found to be altered during adipogenesis, which suggests that they participate in the fine regulation of Wnt and TGF-beta signaling. This study provides useful tools and important clues regarding the roles of secretory factors during adipogenic differentiation, and provides information related to obesity and obesity-related metabolic diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available