4.5 Article

2-DE proteomic approach to the Botrytis cinerea secretome induced with different carbon sources and plant-based elicitors

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 2270-2280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900408

Keywords

Botrytis cinerea; Fungal phytopathogens; Fungal proteomics; Microbiology; Secretome

Funding

  1. Spanish DGICYT (MEC) [AGL2006-13401-C02-02/AGR, AGL2009-13359-C02-02]
  2. Junta de Andalucia government [P07-FQM-02689]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Botrytis cinerea is a phytopathogenic fungus infecting a number of crops (tomatoes, grapes and strawberries), which has been adopted as a model system in molecular phytopathology. B. cinerea uses a wide variety of infection strategies, which are mediated by a set of genes/proteins called pathogenicity/virulence factors. Many of these factors have been described as secreted proteins, and thus the study of this sub-proteome, the secretome, under changing circumstances can help us to understand the roles of these factors, possibly revealing new loci for the fight against the pathogen. A 2-DE, MALDI TOF/TOF-based approach has been developed to establish the proteins secreted to culture media supplemented with different carbon sources and plant-based elicitors (in this study: glucose, cellulose, starch, pectin and tomato cell walls). Secreted proteins were obtained from the culture media by deoxycholate-trichloroacetic acid/phenol extraction, and 76 spots were identified, yielding 95 positive hits that correspond to 56 unique proteins, including several known virulence factors (i.e. pectin methyl esterases, xylanases and proteases). The observed increases in secretion of proteins with established virulence-related functions indicate that this in vitro-induction/proteome-mining approach is a promising strategy for discovering new pathogenicity factors and dissecting infection mechanisms in a discrete fashion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available