4.5 Article

Comparative proteomic profile of rat sciatic nerve and gastrocnemius muscle tissues in ageing by 2-D DIGE

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 2004-2020

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200701162

Keywords

Ageing; Mass spectrometry; Sciatic nerve; Skeletal muscle; Two-dimensional in-gel electrophoresis

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research [FIRB RBR NO7BMCT]
  2. Doctorate School of Medicine, University of Milano

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ageing induces a progressive morphological change and functional decline in muscles and in nerves. Light and electron microscopy, 2-D DIG E and MS, were applied to profile the qualitative and quantitative differences in the proteome and morphology of rat gastrocnemius muscle and sciatic nerve, in healthy 22-month-old rats. At muscle level, morphological changes are associated to fibre atrophy accompanied by myofibrillar loss and degeneration, disappearance of sarcomeres and sarcoplasmic reticulum dilatation, internal migration of nuclei, longitudinal fibre splitting, increment of sub-sarcolemmal mitochondria aggregates and increment of lipofuscin granules. Sciatic nerve shows myelin abnormalities like enfoldings, invaginations, onion bulbs, breakdowns and side axonal atrophy. Proteomic analysis identified changes correlated to morphological abnormalities in metabolic, contractile and cytoskeletal proteins, deregulation of iron homeostasis, change of Ca2+ balance and stress response proteins, accompanied by a deregulation of myelin membrane adhesion protein and proteins regulating the neuronal caliber. By comparing proteomic results from the two tissues, 16 protein isoforms showed the same up and down regulation trend suggesting that there are changes implying a general process which may act as a signal event of degeneration. Only beta enolase and tropomyosin 1 alpha were differentially expressed in the tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available