4.1 Article

Proteomic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells grown under physiologically relevant fluid shear stress conditions

Journal

PROTEOME SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-12-21

Keywords

Biofilm; Staphylococcus aureus; Flow chamber; Shear stress; Proteomics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA [R01-AI059369]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF), USA [EEC-1342388]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1342388] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The biofilm forming bacterium Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for maladies ranging from severe skin infection to major diseases such as bacteremia, endocarditis and osteomyelitis. A flow displacement system was used to grow S. aureus biofilms in four physiologically relevant fluid shear rates (50, 100, 500 and 1000 s(-1)) to identify proteins that are associated with biofilm. Results: Global protein expressions from the membrane and cytosolic fractions of S. aureus biofilm cells grown under the above shear rate conditions are reported. Sixteen proteins in the membrane-enriched fraction and eight proteins in the cytosolic fraction showed significantly altered expression (p < 0.05) under increasing fluid shear. These 24 proteins were identified using nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS. They were found to be associated with various metabolic functions such as glycolysis / TCA pathways, protein synthesis and stress tolerance. Increased fluid shear stress did not influence the expression of two important surface binding proteins: fibronectin-binding and collagen-binding proteins. Conclusions: The reported data suggest that while the general metabolic function of the sessile bacteria is minimal under high fluid shear stress conditions, they seem to retain the binding capacity to initiate new infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available