4.3 Article

Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 82, Issue 9, Pages 1765-1776

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24530

Keywords

binding-site water; molecular dynamics; molecular docking; receptor desolvation energy; binding pose; docking enrichment

Funding

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology 973 [2011CB812402]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21003011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Binding-site water molecular play a crucial role in protein-ligand recognition, either being displaced upon ligand binding or forming water bridges to stabilize the complex. However, rigorously treating explicit binding-site waters is challenging in molecular docking, which requires to fully sample ensembles of waters and to consider the free energy cost of replacing water. Here, we describe a method to incorporate structural and energetic properties of binding-site waters into molecular docking. We first developed a solvent property analysis (SPA) program to compute the replacement free energies of binding-site water molecular by post-processing molecular dynamics trajectories obtained from ligand-free protein structure simulation in explicit water. Next, we implemented a distance-dependent scoring term into DOCK scoring function to take account of the water replacement free energy cost upon ligand binding. We assessed this approach in protein targets containing important binding-site water and we demonstrated that our approach is reliable in reproducing the crystal binding geometries of protein-ligand-water complexes, as well as moderately improving the ligand docking enrichment performance. In addition, SPA program (free available to academic users upon request) may be applied in identifying hot-spot binding-site residues and structure-based lead optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available