4.3 Article

Crystal structures of starch binding domain from Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase in complex with isomaltooligosaccharide: Insights into polysaccharide binding mechanism of CBM21 family

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 1079-1085

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24446

Keywords

starch binding domain; isomaltotriose; Rhizopus oryzae; glucoamylases; isomaltotetraose

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC 101-2311-B-007-009-MY3, NSC 100-2628-B-007-003-MY3]
  2. National Tsing Hua University Taiwan, Republic of China [102N2787E1]
  3. Shen's Culture and Education Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucoamylases are responsible for hydrolysis of starch and polysaccharides to yield beta-d-glucose. Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase (RoGA) is composed of an N-terminal starch binding domain (SBD) and a C-terminal catalytic domain connected by an O-glycosylated linker. Two carbohydrate binding sites in RoSBD have been identified, site I is created by three highly conserved aromatic residues, Trp47, Tyr83, and Tyr94, and site II is built up by Tyr32 and Phe58. Here, the two crystal structures of RoSBD in complex with only alpha-(1,6)-linked isomaltotriose (RoSBD-isoG3) and isomaltotetraose (RoSBD-isoG4) have been determined at 1.2 and 1.3 angstrom, respectively. Interestingly, site II binding is observed in both complexes, while site I binding is only found in the RoSBD-isoG4 complex. Hence, site II acts as the recognition binding site for carbohydrate and site I accommodates site II to bind isoG4. Site I participates in sugar binding only when the number of glucosyl units of oligosaccharides is more than three. Taken together, two carbohydrate binding sites in RoSBD cooperate to reinforce binding mode of glucoamylase with polysaccharides as well as the starch. Proteins 2014; 82:1079-1085. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available