4.3 Article

PDB-scale analysis of known and putative ligand-binding sites with structural sketches

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 747-763

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23232

Keywords

structure and function; ligand-binding site; neighbor search algorithm; pocketome

Funding

  1. JSPS [21680025, 23500374]
  2. FIRST program
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23500374, 21680025] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational investigation of protein functions is one of the most urgent and demanding tasks in the field of structural bioinformatics. Exhaustive pairwise comparison of known and putative ligand-binding sites, across protein families and folds, is essential in elucidating the biological functions and evolutionary relationships of proteins. Given the vast amounts of data available now, existing 3D structural comparison methods are not adequate due to their computation time complexity. In this article, we propose a new bit string representation of binding sites called structural sketches, which is obtained by random projections of triplet descriptors. It allows us to use ultra-fast all-pair similarity search methods for strings with strictly controlled error rates. Exhaustive comparison of 1.2 million known and putative binding sites finished in similar to 30 h on a single core to yield 88 million similar binding site pairs. Careful investigation of 3.5 million pairs verified by TM-align revealed several notable analogous sites across distinct protein families or folds. In particular, we succeeded in finding highly plausible functions of several pockets via strong structural analogies. These results indicate that our method is a promising tool for functional annotation of binding sites derived from structural genomics projects. Proteins 2011. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available