4.1 Article

Therapeutic epitopes of Leptospira LipL32 protein and their characteristics

Journal

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 135-144

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzu006

Keywords

epitope mapping; Leptospira adhesive matrices; leptospirosis; mimotopes; neutralizing mAb

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund [MRG5380138, DPG5380001]
  2. National Research University (NRU) project of the Office of Higher Education Commission
  3. Mahidol University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two LipL32-specific mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbLPF1 and mAbLPF2) which neutralized Leptospira-mediated hemolysis in vitro and rescued hamsters from lethal Leptospira infection were produced. In this communication, locations and characteristics of the protective epitopes of the mAbs were studied by using a truncated LipL32 recombinant protein based-immunoassay and phage consensus mimotope identification and multiple alignments. The mAbLPF1 epitope consisted of P243, L244, I245, H246, L252 and Q253 on the LipL32 protein; it is mapped on the surface-exposed region of non-continuous beta 13-turn and C-terminal amphipathic alpha 6 helix with hydrophobic patch, contributing to phospholipid/host cell adhesion and membrane insertion on one side, and hydrophilic, acidic and basic amino acid residues on another side. The epitope peptide of the mAbLPF2 is linear 122PEEKSMPHW130 and located on surface-exposed alpha 1 and alpha 2 between beta 7 and beta 8 that bound to several host constituents. Both epitopes are highly conserved among the pathogenic and intermediately pathogenic Leptospira spp. and are absent from the LipL32 superfamily proteins of other microorganisms. This study not only enlightens the molecular mechanisms of the therapeutic mAbLPF1 and mAbLPF2, but also elaborates the potential of the two LipL32 regions as diagnostic and vaccine targets for leptospirosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available