4.1 Article

High-affinity binding to staphylococcal protein A by an engineered dimeric Affibody molecule

Journal

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 635-644

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzt038

Keywords

molecular recognition; phage display; protein engineering; proteinprotein interactions; protein structure

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [VR 621-2011-5812]
  2. GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Affibody molecules are engineered binding proteins, in which the three-helix bundle motif of the Z domain derived from protein A is used as a scaffold for sequence variation. We used phage display to select Affibody binders to staphylococcal protein A itself. The best binder, called ZpA963, binds with similar affinity and kinetics to the five homologous E, D, A, B and C domains of protein A, and to a five-domain protein A construct with an average dissociation constant, K-D, of 20 nM. The structure of ZpA963 in complex with the Z domain shows that it interacts with a surface on Z that is identical in the five protein A domains, which explains the multi-domain affinity. This property allows for high-affinity binding by dimeric Affibody molecules that simultaneously engage two protein A domains in a complex. We studied two ZpA963 dimers in which the subunits were linked by a C-terminal disulfide in a symmetric dimer or head-to-tail in a fusion protein, respectively. The dimers both bind protein A with high affinity, very slow off-rates and with saturation-dependent kinetics that can be understood in terms of dimer binding to multiple sites. The head-to-tail (ZpA963)(2)htt dimer binds with an off-rate of k(off) 5 10(6) s(1) and an estimated K-D 16 pM. The results illustrate how dimers of selected monomer binding proteins can provide an efficient route for engineering of high-affinity binders to targets that contain multiple homologous domains or repeated structural units.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available