4.5 Review

Evolving standards in the treatment of docetaxel-refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer

Journal

PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 192-205

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2011.23

Keywords

castrate-resistant prostate cancer; docetaxel-refractory; cabazitaxel; abiraterone; sipuleucel-T

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Imclone
  3. Pfizer/Wyeth
  4. Active Biotech
  5. Medivation
  6. Dendreon
  7. Novartis
  8. sanofi-aventis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The management of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has taken several leaps forward in the past year, with the demonstration of improved overall survival with three novel agents (sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel with prednisone and abiraterone acetate with prednisone), and a significant delay in skeletal-related events observed with denosumab. The pipeline of systemic therapies in prostate cancer remains strong, as multiple agents with a diverse array of mechanisms of action are showing preliminary signs of clinical benefit, leading to more definitive phase III confirmatory trials. In this review, which represents part 1 of a two-part series on metastatic CRPC, we will summarize the mechanisms of resistance to hormonal and chemotherapies and discuss the evolving landscape of treatment options for men with CRPC, with a particular focus on currently approved and emerging treatment options following docetaxel administration, as well as prognostic factors in this post-docetaxel state. As docetaxel remains the standard initial systemic therapy for men with metastatic CRPC for both palliative and life-prolonging purposes, knowledge of these evolving standards will help to optimize delivery of care and long-term outcomes. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2011) 14, 192-205; doi:10.1038/pcan.2011.23; published online 17 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available