4.4 Article

Clinical Activity of Enzalutamide Versus Docetaxel in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing After Abiraterone

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 74, Issue 13, Pages 1278-1285

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.22844

Keywords

abiraterone; docetaxel; enzalutamide; sequencing; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA006973, T32 CA009071, P50 CA058236] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. METHODS. We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n = 30) or docetaxel (n = 31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA(30)) or >50% (PSA(50)), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups. RESULTS. Compared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA(30) (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA(50) (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P = 0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P = 0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS. Treatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone. Prostate 74: 1278-1285, 2014. (C) 2014Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available