4.4 Article

Expression Analysis of Putative Stem Cell Markers in Human Benign and Malignant Prostate

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 18-25

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.21217

Keywords

prostate cancer; stem cells; EZH2; SOX2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Stem cells were suggested to be present in human prostate cancer as a small population of distinct cells, which may contribute to carcinogenesis, tumor recurrence, and chemoresistance. To identify potential prostatic stem cells, we analyzed the expression of several potential stem cell markers in benign prostate and prostatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS. CD44, CD133, Oct4, SOX2, and EZH2 expression was detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using tissue microarray assays (TMA) composed of benign (non-neoplastic) prostatic tissue, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Positive staining was defined as 1+ (<10%), 2+ (10-50%), or 3+ (>50%). RESULTS. We found CD44 staining in 97% and 72% of benign+HGPIN and malignant lesions, respectively. CD133 staining was detected in a small fraction (4 of 67) of prostate carcinomas. We found that Oct4 nuclear expression was strongly associated with benign lesions and HGPIN but not prostate cancer (P < 0.05). In most cases, nuclear expression of EZH2 and SOX2 was detected in less than 10% of cells in non-neoplastic prostate glands, HGPINs or prostate adenocarcinomas. Moreover, 27 of 33 SOX2 1+ prostate cancers were also EZH2 1+, whereas all 33 of these cases were CD44+. CONCLUSIONS. Expression of CD44 and Oct4 identified large populations of benign and malignant cells in the prostate, which did not fit the definition of stem cells as a small fraction of the total cell population. Our results suggest that combined expression of embryonic stem cell markers EZH2 and SOX2 might identify potential cancer stem cells as a minor (< 10%) subgroup in CD44+ prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 71: 18-25, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available