4.4 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Analysis of a Serum Test for Prostate Cancer That Detects a Second Epitope of EPCA-2 (Retracted article. See vol. 72, pg. 1157, 2012)

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 69, Issue 11, Pages 1188-1194

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20963

Keywords

prostate cancer; proteomics; biomarkers; nuclear matrix; immunoassay

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U02CA86323, U01 CA086323-10, U01 CA086323] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. We have previously shown that EPCA-2 can serve as a highly specific and sensitive serum marker for prostate cancer. As a component of our validation of this marker, we have performed an initial evaluation of an assay that detects a distinct epitope of the same protein: EPCA-2.19. The goals of this study are to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of the EPCA-2.19 assay, in a non-screening population, and to demonstrate that such test based has similar characteristics as the initial assay produced. METHODS. Three hundred twenty-eight serum samples from men with PSA values < and >2.5 ng/ml who had negative biopsies, men with BPH, men with organ-confined and non-organ-confined prostate cancer, as well as control populations were evaluated using the EPCA-2.19 assay. RESULTS. At a cut-off of 0.5 ng/ml and above, EPCA-2.19 has a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 91% in separating normal men with PSA < and >2.5 ng/ml, and men with BPH from those with prostate cancer. Receiver Operator Curve analyses of the EPCA-2.19 assay demonstrate an area under the curve of 0.982 (95% CI 0.952-0.996, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. This study confirms our earlier findings that the assay that detects against a second epitope of EPCA-2 yields almost identical results to those obtained for the first published assay (EPCA-2.22). While this provides some validation of our earlier studies, larger multi-institutional studies still need to be performed. Prostate 69: 1188.1, 194, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available