4.4 Article

Disseminated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow Following Definitive Radiotherapy for Intermediate or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 68, Issue 15, Pages 1607-1614

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20826

Keywords

metastasis; prostate-specific antigen; cytokeratin; immunocytochemistry; disease progression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) of clinically progression-free prostate cancer (PC) patients at least 2 years after curatively intended radiotherapy (RT) with or without adjuvant hormone treatment. METHODS. All patients were T1-3N0M0 with intermediate or high risk of progression. Median time from RT to BM sampling was 5 years (2-8). A standardized immunocytochemical method applying the anticytokeratin antibodies AE1/AE3 was used for DTCs detection in 130 patients. Morphological characterization of immunostained cells was performed to exclude false positive cells. The post-treatment BM was explored in relation to pre-treatment risk factors, treatment strategy and serum levels of Testosterone and PSA at the time of BM sampling. Longitudinal changes in BM status were studied in a sub-group of 109 patients who also had donated BM prior to treatment. RESULTS. Post-treatment BM-aspirates were positive for DTCs in 17% of cases without correlation to any of the tested variables. Out of 14 patients who had DTCs in BM prior to treatment, all but one had become post-treatment negative. Out of 95 patients with pretreatment negative BM status, 18 (19%) had become post-treatment positive. CONCLUSIONS. DTCs in BM were found in 17% of clinically progression-free PC patients following RT. The detection of these cells may provide PSA-independent prognostic information remaining to be explored by prolonged follow-up. Prostate 68: 1607-1614, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available