4.1 Article

The very low density lipoprotein receptor is not necessary for maintaining brain polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrations

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2009.11.003

Keywords

Very low density lipoprotein receptor; Brain; Arachidonic acid; Docosahexaenoic acid; Cholesterol; Transport; Polyunsaturated fatty acid; Knockout; Behavioural deficits mouse

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), especially docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids, as well as cholesterol are important for neural development and maintaining brain function. However, in contrast to cholesterol, the brain is unable to synthesize the required amounts of these PUFA de novo and requires a constant supply from plasma. Suggested pools of uptake include plasma unesterified PUFA or the uptake of PUFA-containing lipoproteins via lipoprotein receptors into endothelial cells of the blood brain barrier. Our study tested whether the very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLr) is necessary for maintaining brain PUFA and cholesterol concentrations. Moreover, since VLDLr knockout (VLDLr-/-) mice have been reported to have behavioural deficits, this study asked the question whether altered brain PUFA and cholesterol concentrations might be related to these deficits. VLDLr-/- and wild-type mice had ad libitum access to chow. At 7 weeks of age the mice were sacrificed. and the cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and the remainder of the brain were isolated for total fatty acid and cholesterol analyses. There were no differences in total lipid PUFA or cholesterol concentrations in any of the four brain regions between VLDLr-/- and wild-type mice. These findings demonstrate that the VLDLr is not necessary for maintaining brain PUFA concentrations and suggest that other mechanisms to transport PUFA into the brain must exist. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available