4.2 Article

Differential actions of the prostacyclin analogues treprostinil and iloprost and the selexipag metabolite, MRE-269 (ACT-333679) in rat small pulmonary arteries and veins

Journal

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2013.07.003

Keywords

IP receptor agonists; Prostanoid IP receptors; Rat distal pulmonary arteries; Prostacyclin analogues; MRE-269; Iloprost; Treprostinil

Funding

  1. United Therapeutics Corporation, North Carolina, United States
  2. University College London, UK.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonists, treprostini I, iloprost and the selexipag metabolite, MRE-269 (ACT-333679) Were evaluated in rat distal pulmonary blood vessels. Small pulmonary arteries and veins were pre-contracted with the thromboxane mimetic, U46619 (25 and 100 nM, respectively), and relaxation determined with and without IP receptor antagonists, RO1138452 and RO3244794. In arteries, treprostinil was a more potent vasorelaxant than iloprost, while the efficacy of iloprost was greater. In pulmonary arteries, treprostinil-induced relaxation was essentially abolished by both IP antagonists (1 mu M), while responses to iloprost were partially inhibited. Both treprostinil and iloprost were equipotent, prominently relaxing pulmonary veins with responses being similarly and partially sensitive to IP antagonists. In contrast, RO1138452 failed to inhibit relaxations to MRE-269 in either pulmonary arteries or veins, suggesting no involvement of typical IP receptors. Thus, rat pulmonary tissues cannot be considered appropriate to assess classical IP receptors using the proposed highly selective non-prostanoid agonist MRE-269, contrasting with the IP receptor agonism profile of prostacyclin analogues, iloprost and treprostinil. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available