4.6 Review

On the physics of semiconductor quantum dots for applications in lasers and quantum optics

Journal

PROGRESS IN QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 109-184

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2013.04.001

Keywords

Quantum dots; Semiconductor lasers; Quantum optics

Funding

  1. Sandia's Solid-State Lighting Science Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The progression of carrier confinement from quantum wells to quantum dots has received considerable interests because of the potential to improve the semiconductor laser performance at the underlying physics level and to explore quantum optical phenomena in semiconductors. Associated with the transition from quantum wells to quantum dots is a switch from a solid-state-like quasi-continuous density of states to an atom-like system with discrete states. As discussed in this paper, the transition changes the role of the carrier interaction processes that directly influence optical properties. Our goals in this review are two-fold. One is to identify and describe the physics that allows new applications and determines intrinsic limitations for applications in light emitters. We will analyze the use of quantum dots in conventional laser devices and in microcavity emitters, where cavity quantum electrodynamics can alter spontaneous emission and generate nonclassical light for applications in quantum information technologies. A second goal is to promote a new connection between physics and technology. This paper demonstrates how a first-principles theory may be applied to guide important technological decisions by predicting the performances of various active materials under a broad set of experimental conditions. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available