4.8 Review

Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils

Journal

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 241-264

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002

Keywords

Cellulose pretreatment; Nanofibrillated cellulose (CNF); Bacterial cellulose; Chemical modification; Adsorption; Grafting

Funding

  1. LabEx Tec 21 (Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR-11-LABX-0030]
  2. PolyNat Carnot Institute (Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR-16-CARN-0025-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of nanocellulose has garnered increased attention in the past decades and is now the second-ranked priority of the European bioeconomy. The number of papers published on nanocellulose has increased by six fold in the last five years and studies on nanofibrillated cellulose (CNF) represent nearly 65% of that literature. Studies in the most recent years have focused on CNF production at industrial scales, since it is hampered by high energy consumption and cost. Chemical pretreatment of cellulose fibers is essential to improving nanofibrillation and decreasing energy consumption. Moreover, functionalized CNFs and bacterial cellulose (BC) endowed with additional properties are expected to be used for high-value added applications. This nanoscale material is bio-based, biodegradable, and biocompatible with very promising barrier and mechanical properties, although its high hydrophilicity is a limiting factor for some applications. CNF and BC modification is also a key step to improve its compatibility with different macromolecular matrices in the elaboration of composite materials. This review aims at providing a guide to CNF chemical pretreatment possibilities, optimize its production, and exhaustively report the available CNF and BC chemical modification techniques capable of producing high value-added materials. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available