4.8 Review

The chemomechanical properties of microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates

Journal

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 3-4, Pages 536-583

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.06.003

Keywords

Biopolymer; Polyhydroxyalkanoates; Microbial polyesters; Poly((R)-3-hydroxybutyrate); Poly((R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects funding scheme [LP099091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbially produced polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are fully biodegradable biopolyesters that have attracted much attention recently as alternative polymeric materials that can be produced from biorenewable and biowaste resources. The properties of these biological polymers are affected by the same fundamental principles as those of fossil-fuel derived polyolefins, with a broad range of compositions available based on the incorporation of different monomers into the PHA polymer structure, and with this broad range tailoring subsequent properties. This review comprehensively covers current understanding with respect to PHA biosynthesis and crystallinity, and the effect of composition, microstructure and supramacromolecular structures on chemomechanical properties. While polymer composition and microstructure are shown to affect these properties, the review also finds that a key driver for determining polymer performance properties is compositional distribution. From this review it follows that PHA-PHA blend compositions are industrially important, and the performance properties of such blends are discussed. A particular need is identified for further research into the effect of chemical compositional distribution on macromolecular structure and end-use properties, advanced modeling of the PHA accumulation process and chain growth kinetics for better process control. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available