4.8 Review

Engineering neural stem cell fates with hydrogel design for central nervous system regeneration

Journal

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 1105-1129

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.004

Keywords

Neural stem cell; Hydrogel; Niche; Central nervous system; Regeneration

Funding

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1346387] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1055922, 0748129] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injuries and disease to the central nervous system (CNS) are accompanied by severe consequences, as the adult CNS has very limited capacity to replace the lost neural cells. Different sources of neural stem cells for CNS tissue regeneration exist, including embryonic stem cells (ESCs), fetal stem cells, adult stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and so on. However, before stem cell therapy can be a viable option for treatments, many issues still need to be resolved, including low viability, lack of control of stem cell fate, and low cell engraftment after transplantation. Though controlling these parameters is extremely challenging, engineering structures that create permissive niches for the transplanted cells, such as the use of biocompatible hydrogels, is a promising approach. This review will focus on highlighting existing hydrogel systems currently being investigated for CNS tissue regeneration, as well as discuss design criteria for hydrogels and methods for manipulating stem cells within hydrogels systems. Finally, the use of these hydrogel systems as carriers for stem cell transplantation in CNS injury and disease models will be discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available