4.5 Article

The effects of land-use combinations on soil erosion: a case study in the Loess Plateau of China

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0309133309350264

Keywords

Cesium-137 tracing; land-use combination; Loess Plateau of China; soil erosion

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB421104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40621061]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [GJHZ0948]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land use is one of the key factors affecting soil erosion in the Loess Plateau of China. This paper examines soil erosion under different land uses and land-use combinations using Cs-137 tracing in the Yangjuangou Catchment, a tributary of the Yan River in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi Province. The results show that the order of Cs-137 activity in different land uses decreases sequentially from mature forest to grass to young forest to orchard to terrace crop, indicating that the mature forests had the lowest erosion rates while the terraced cropland produced the highest erosion amount. The majority of Cs-137 is distributed in the top 0-10 cm of the soil layer. The Cs-137 activity in mature forest and grass soil is significantly higher than in other land uses. Three land-use combinations on the hillslope were selected to study the relationship between land-use combination and soil erosion. The mixtures of 'grass (6 years old) + mature forest (25 years old) + grass (25 years old)' and 'grass (6 years old) + young forest (6 years old) + mature forest (25 years old) + grass (25 years old)' are better for soil erosion control, lowering soil erosion amount by 42% compared with a land-use combination of 'grass (6 years old) and shrub (6 years old)'. The results provide an important basis for optimizing land-use combinations to control soil erosion on slopes and may also result in important ecological benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available