4.7 Article

On the determination of the emitter saturation current density from lifetime measurements of silicon devices

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 850-866

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2167

Keywords

silicon; photoconductance measurement; minority carrier lifetime; emitter recombination current; solar cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contactless photoconductance measurements are commonly used to extract the emitter saturation current density (J(oe)) for crystalline silicon samples containing an emitter on the surface. We review the physics behind the analysis of J(oe) and compare the commonly used approximations with more generalised solutions using two-dimensional device simulations. We quantify errors present in such approximations for different test conditions involving varying illumination conditions and surface properties in samples with the same emitter on both sides. The simulated J(oe) obtained from the dark hole current from the emitter into the bulk is nearly the same as the simulated J(oe) determined by photoconductance measurements of the rear diffusion. The simulated J(oe) at the front emitter is equivalent to that at the rear emitter only when the sample is subject to a nearly constant and flat generation profile. For illumination conditions including visible light, the simulated J(oe) at the front emitter is smaller than the simulated J(oe) at the rear emitter. Both J(oe) at the rear emitter and from the dark hole current in the emitter remain nearly constant over a wide range of base doping densities. The approximations used for the determination of J(oe) from photoconductance measurements make J(oe) dependent on the excess minority carrier density. Lifetime measurements demonstrate that, even in high-quality silicon, J(oe) should be determined from the analytical solution as a function of excess minority carrier density including Shockley-Read-Hall recombination. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available