4.7 Article

Development and experimental evaluation of a complete solar thermophotovoltaic system

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 1025-1039

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2201

Keywords

solar thermophotovoltaic; TPV cell array; sunlight concentration; high-temperature emitters

Funding

  1. 'Consejeria de Educacion de la Comunidad de Madrid y del Fondo Social Europeo (FSE)'
  2. European project FULLSPECTRUM [SES6-CT-2003-502620]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a practical implementation of a solar thermophotovoltaic (TPV) system. The system presented in this paper comprises a sunlight concentrator system, a cylindrical cup-shaped absorber/emitter (made of tungsten coated with HfO2), and an hexagonal-shaped water-cooled TPV generator comprising 24 germanium TPV cells, which is surrounding the cylindrical absorber/emitter. This paper focuses on the development of shingled TPV cell arrays, the characterization of the sunlight concentrator system, the estimation of the temperature achieved by the cylindrical emitters operated under concentrated sunlight, and the evaluation of the full system performance under real outdoor irradiance conditions. From the system characterization, we have measured short-circuit current densities up to 0.95A/cm(2), electric power densities of 67mW/cm(2), and a global conversion efficiency of about 0.8%. To our knowledge, this is the first overall solar-to-electricity efficiency reported for a complete solar thermophotovoltaic system. The very low efficiency is mainly due to the overheating of the cells (up to 120 degrees C) and to the high optical concentrator losses, which prevent the achievement of the optimum emitter temperature. The loss analysis shows that by improving both aspects, efficiencies above 5% could be achievable in the very short term and efficiencies above 10% could be achieved with further improvements. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available