4.4 Review

Charmonium and bottomonium in heavy-ion collisions

Journal

PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 209-266

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2010.07.002

Keywords

Heavy quarkonia; Quark Gluon Plasma; Nuclear matter; Ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-0449489, PHY-0969394]
  2. A -v -Humboldt foundation
  3. Polish Ministry for Science and Higher Education [N N 202 0953 33]
  4. RFBR [08-02-01003-a]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review the present status in the theoretical and phenomenological understanding of charmonium and bottomonium production in heavy-ion collisions We start by recapitulating the basic notion of anomalous quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions and its recent amendments involving regeneration reactions We then survey in some detail concepts and ingredients needed for a comprehensive approach to utilize heavy quarkonia as a probe of hot and dense matter The theoretical discussion encompasses recent lattice QCD computations of quarkonium properties in the Quark-Gluon Plasma their interpretations using effective potential models inelastic rate calculations and insights from analyses of electromagnetic plasmas We illustrate the powerful techniques of thermodynamic Green functions (T-matrices) to provide a general framework for implementing microscopic properties of heavy quarkonia Into a kinetic theory of suppression and regeneration reactions The theoretical concepts are tested in applications to heavy-ion reactions at SPS RHIC and LHC We outline perspectives for future experiments on charmonium and bottomonium production in heavy-ion collisions over a large range of energies (FAIR RHIC-II and LHC) These are expected to provide key insights into hadronic matter under extreme conditions using quarkonium observables (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available