4.8 Article

Recovery from severe H7N9 disease is associated with diverse response mechanisms dominated by CD8+ T cells

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7833

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [81471556, 81470094, 81430030]
  2. Program for Emergency Response to H7N9 Outbreak [2013QLG003]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning
  4. 973 National Key Basic Research Project [2014CB542502]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  6. NHMRC Program Grant [GNT567122]
  7. ACSRF Group Mission [16621]
  8. University of Melbourne IRRTF Grants
  9. University of Melbourne International Research Scholarship
  10. CONACyT Scholar
  11. NHMRC
  12. Australian Heart Foundation Career Development Fellowship [1061435]
  13. NIH grant [AI107625]
  14. St Jude Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance [HHSN272201400006C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The avian origin A/H7N9 influenza virus causes high admission rates (>99%) and mortality (>30%), with ultimately favourable outcomes ranging from rapid recovery to prolonged hospitalization. Using a multicolour assay for monitoring adaptive and innate immunity, here we dissect the kinetic emergence of different effector mechanisms across the spectrum of H7N9 disease and recovery. We find that a diversity of response mechanisms contribute to resolution and survival. Patients discharged within 2-3 weeks have early prominent H7N9-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses, while individuals with prolonged hospital stays have late recruitment of CD8(+)/CD4(+) T cells and antibodies simultaneously (recovery by week 4), augmented even later by prominent NK cell responses (recovery >30 days). In contrast, those who succumbed have minimal influenza-specific immunity and little evidence of T-cell activation. Our study illustrates the importance of robust CD8(+) T-cell memory for protection against severe influenza disease caused by newly emerging influenza A viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available