4.7 Review

Erythropoietin: Elucidating new cellular targets that broaden therapeutic strategies

Journal

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 194-213

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.02.002

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Akt; angiogenesis; apoptosis; cancer; cardiac; caspases; diabetes; endothelial; erythropoietin; forkhead; GSK-3 beta; inflammation; microglia; mitochondria; neurodegeneration; NF-kappa B; renal; STATs; Wnt

Categories

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES06639, P30 ES006639] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS053946, R01 NS053946-01A2, R01 NS053946-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given that erythropoietin (EPO) is no longer believed to have exclusive biological activity in the hematopoietic system, EPO is now considered to have applicability in a variety of nervous system disorders that can overlap with vascular disease, metabolic impairments, and immune system function. As a result, EPO may offer efficacy for a broad number of disorders that involve Alzheimer's disease, cardiac insufficiency, stroke, trauma, and diabetic complications. During a number of clinical conditions, EPO is robust and can prevent metabolic compromise, neuronal and vascular degeneration, and inflammatory cell activation. Yet, use of EPO is not without its considerations especially in light of frequent concerns that may compromise clinical care. Recent work has elucidated a number of novel cellular pathways governed by EPO that can open new avenues to avert deleterious effects of this agent and offer previously unrecognized perspectives for therapeutic strategies. Obtaining greater insight into the role of EPO in the nervous system and elucidating its unique cellular pathways may provide greater cellular viability not only in the nervous system but also throughout the body. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available