4.8 Article

Allelic variation contributes to bacterial host specificity

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9754

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AI098041]
  2. USDA [2013-67015-21285]
  3. University of Pennsylvania Veterinary Center for Infectious Disease
  4. University of Pennsylvania Center for Host-Microbial Interactions
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1330800] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  9. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1305112] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the molecular parameters that regulate cross-species transmission and host adaptation of potential pathogens is crucial to control emerging infectious disease. Although microbial pathotype diversity is conventionally associated with gene gain or loss, the role of pathoadaptive nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) has not been systematically evaluated. Here, our genome-wide analysis of core genes within Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium genomes reveals a high degree of allelic variation in surface-exposed molecules, including adhesins that promote host colonization. Subsequent multinomial logistic regression, MultiPhen and Random Forest analyses of known/ suspected adhesins from 580 independent Typhimurium isolates identifies distinct host-specific nsSNP signatures. Moreover, population and functional analyses of host-associated nsSNPs for FimH, the type 1 fimbrial adhesin, highlights the role of key allelic residues in host-specific adherence in vitro. Together, our data provide the first concrete evidence that functional differences between allelic variants of bacterial proteins likely contribute to pathoadaption to diverse hosts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available